 |
| →→→→ |
 |
TOPIC: ANSWERS |
|
|
 |
Posted on May.24.2007 @ 10:19PM EDT by En Shin
To all,
I haven't spent a lot of time on this forum, but I have been in and out enough to notice a couple of things. I offer the following not as criticism, but as observation and commentary.
First, I notice that there are always the same four or five people constituting the bulk of every thread. Some threads consist of over 50 postings by no more than two or three people. Why are there no more posters? And how does this avoid being a completely insular conversation, the same old people takling about the same old things, over and over again?
Second, I notice that when a rare newcomer checks in, generally they can't get a straight answer. Sometimes they are ignored completely, sometimes they are offered answers which are not answers, sometimes they are met with snide remarks, or remarks which might be interpreted as snide, by some of the long-term participants.
Third, several participants are occasionally simply rude. No other way to put it. You write terse, flippant, ill-considered posts which seem intended to demean or belittle the other writer.
My thoughts about this:
First, there are not more participants because the forum feels like and old-boys (and girls) club. A newcomer picks up on this immediately and feels left out/shut out. Newcomers should be welcomed, if this in indeed a public forum and not just a place for five people to conveniently IM each other.
Second, related to the first, people who ask a straight question deserve a straight answer. When someone says "I don't know how to use this forum. What do I do?", "Beautiful answer" is not a proper response. This person needs an explanation. Moreover, a smiley face or a couple of dots might work for you and the three people you have corresponded with forever, but don't provide much of an answer for anyone else. "Skillful means" means understanding what the other person needs and coming to where they are to help them in a manner that is meaningful to them. Being 'zenny' and mysterious is generally not helpful to most people who might come here with a serious inquiry.
Third, there is absolutely no reason for rudeness and inconsideration. It is the height of self-undulgence. If you can't take the time to understand where the other person is coming from and offer something that is useful/helpful/meaningful, why bother? Certainly this forum was set up to provide a place for people to go for answers, not as a stage for three or four people to strut and posture. Please, be considerate of others.
Peace,
En Shin
|
|
↓Go to Latest Reply
|
→Reply to this Topic
→Email En Shin
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from ______
May.25.2007
05:21AM EDT
|
 |
You want answers? So listen to your questions. The listening is your answer. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71306
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from En Shin
May.25.2007
10:00AM EDT
→Email En Shin
|
 |
And my fourth point is, no one ever engages. This is not a conversation. It's people shooting one-liners art eachother.
Once again, the response to my post was terse, flippant, ill-considered, not to the point, and had virtually nothing to do with what I said.
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71313
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from zbishak
May.25.2007
10:32AM EDT
→Email zbishak
|
 |
Hello En Shin,
Welcome, a creek or a stream in places deep or shallow, the current fast or still, they are as they are. My wife has a husband though i am not him, would i be exactly as she thinks, what would there be for her to know of me? |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71314
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from shayne
May.25.2007
10:48AM EDT
→Email shayne
|
 |
hey en shin. whats up? |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71315
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from stephen
May.25.2007
10:50AM EDT
→Email stephen
|
 |
Dear En Shin:
I agree with you.
Question should be address is a helpful manner.
To be flippant is not being helpful.
Statements of contention should be discussed in the light of the teaching.
Compassion should be offered.
However no pages of Buddhist interactions would be complete without the Trickster. A fundamental paradigm or archetype is the “trickster,” an impish hero reflecting wisdom through his own foolishness or the foolishness of others. This to can be a teaching tool if handle with style and grace.
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71316
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from ______
May.25.2007
10:58AM EDT
|
 |
Quote: "And my fourth point is, no one ever engages. This is not a conversation. It's people shooting one-liners art eachother.
Once again, the response to my post was terse, flippant, ill-considered, not to the point, and had virtually nothing to do with what I said.
" .........
Once again? Nothing flippant in my response, no shooting of one-liners, not ill-considered, not terse, very much to the point and had everything to do with what you said. You don't like it and you don't understand. But you need the ears to hear. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71317
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from ______
May.25.2007
11:01AM EDT
|
 |
Quote: " Dear En Shin:
I agree with you.
Question should be address is a helpful manner.
To be flippant is not being helpful.
Statements of contention should be discussed in the light of the teaching.
Compassion should be offered.
However no pages of Buddhist interactions would be complete without the Trickster. A fundamental paradigm or archetype is the “trickster,” an impish hero reflecting wisdom through his own foolishness or the foolishness of others. This to can be a teaching tool if handle with style and grace.
" .........
And the same goes for you too. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71318
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from ______
May.25.2007
11:03AM EDT
|
 |
Let me know when you come up with a fifth point. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71319
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from whatzen
May.25.2007
01:00PM EDT
→Email whatzen
|
 |
WU
Theres a one-liner for you.
And have a nice day!
;-)
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71320
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from En Shin
May.25.2007
03:50PM EDT
→Email En Shin
|
 |
Quote: "Quote: "And my fourth point is, no one ever engages. This is not a conversation. It's people shooting one-liners art eachother.
Once again, the response to my post was terse, flippant, ill-considered, not to the point, and had virtually nothing to do with what I said.
" .........
Once again? Nothing flippant in my response, no shooting of one-liners, not ill-considered, not terse, very much to the point and had everything to do with what you said. You don't like it and you don't understand. But you need the ears to hear." .........
But I did not say I "want answers," I said all folks should get well-considered, courteous answers, and often they don't. And I didn't ask any questions, so "listening to my questions" is not an option, nor will my "answers be found in them."
Moreover, if your advice is for everyone, that they should simply listen to their own questions and find their answers there, doesn't that just invite them buzz off and keep their questions to themselves?
This is what I mean when I say that the response was not to the point, that and the fact that it did not acknowledge or address anything I said, as did the posts of some others.
I don't mean to get on a big soapbox about this, but real live discussions, where people bring what questions they have and share what wisdom they have, and actively engage each other in the pursuit of wisdom, ought to be possible here, don't you think?
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71322
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Woodsman
May.25.2007
04:20PM EDT
|
 |
I'm even worse in person. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71323
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from En Shin
May.25.2007
04:39PM EDT
→Email En Shin
|
 |
Hello to all who have signed on in this thread. Thank you for your comments.
Just a few more thoughts and perhaps we'll leave it alone. My Zen teacher, with whom I have studied for many years, is relentless. In sanzen (interview), when he asks you to demonstrate your grasp of a koan, or manifest your true nature in a certain context, nothing but the real thing will pass. When an action is required, it might be as simple as a hand gesture, but it must be exactly the right one. When words are required, sometimes only one word will do, but it must be exactly the correct word. Tone, inflection, body language, look in the eye, all are part of the answer. A long verbal explanation is unacceptable.
But then he comes out and gives a Dharma talk. It might go on for 45 minutes and involve a detailed explanation and demonstration of a specific teaching. During this talk he asks for questions and goes to great lengths to answer them as specifically, directly and precisely as possible. At no point does he answer a question with the kind of demonstration that might be given in sanzen. It is not the place for it.
The point I am making is that I'm drawing a comparison between the two types of teaching. One is a direct communication between teacher and student, and much of that communication is beyond words, and does not appeal to the intellect, but to a deeper wisdom. The other is a direct appeal to the intellect, because intellectual understanding of the teachings is one of the two halves of the path to awakening.
I can't help but think that a discussion of this type is far more closely allied to the latter than to the former. That's why I feel that it is important to engage participants and attempt to provide real, sensitive, compassionate contributions to the best of one's ability. Also, I'm just not sure that a forum like this is the proper place to attempt to demonstrate one's immediate grasp of zen, as one would in interview. There is simply too much room for misinterpretation. I can't see your eye or hand, read your body language. I know it wouldn't wash with my teacher.
When someone signs on and asks a thoughtful question, such as " Can someone be both a Buddhist or a Christian?" They are not asking anyone to manifest their grasp of zen for them. They are asking, "Can someone be both a Buddhist or a Christian?" This is what I mean about skillful means, and about my teacher being relentless. Only what is appropriate will pass. And in this case, a thoughtful question requires a thoughtful answer. We have to listen to the question, try our best to determine what the questioner needs and provide that in a form which works for the questioner.
Anyway, this is what guides me in my postings, and will continue to guide me. I offer it for your review.
Peace,
En Shin
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71324
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Lynnoh
May.25.2007
06:29PM EDT
→Email Lynnoh
|
 |
:) |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71325
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Lynnoh
May.25.2007
06:36PM EDT
→Email Lynnoh
|
 |
En Shin,
what is the significance of "nine" bows? I've heard this many times before.
Lynn |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71327
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Lynnoh
May.25.2007
06:39PM EDT
→Email Lynnoh
|
 |
thank you |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71328
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from En Shin
May.25.2007
09:39PM EDT
→Email En Shin
|
 |
HI, Lynn,
As I understand it, nine bows is is a token of deepest respect. In some Japanese traditions in is customary to bow nine times on entering the room with the roshi for sanzen. I can't say exactly which traditions those are, but I believe they are of the Soto lineage.
I believe the significance of the number nine is that it is three times three. Three bows are given at the start of any supervised zazen session, and represent a bow in honor and recognition of each of the Three Jewels, the Buddha, the Dharma and the Sangha. In token of deeper respect or reverence, three bows are made to each on the most solemn occasions.
Probably there is more to it than this, but this is what I can say with some measure of surety.
Peace,
En Shin
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71333
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from kelvintan
May.25.2007
11:45PM EDT
→Email kelvintan
|
 |
When the Wheel of Dharma turns, let go off all our emotions and desires.
One will be able to see clearly and directly the truth of our experience in this very moment, to be aware, to be mindful.
Let us All take delight in this sharing and connecting
Happiness come from the Heart
You give and I take the joy in Sharing It
May All Beings
Be Well & Happy
With Metta |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71334
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Pendragon
May.26.2007
12:08AM EDT
→Email Pendragon
|
 |
Too many tricksters! Way too many tricksters! One trickster is like a dash of salt in the soup. Twenty tricksters is like a cup of salt in the soup.
A little boy at a Quaker meeting kept standing up and speaking as the spirit moved him.
Finally, an elder stood up and said "I think the spirit is moving Tommy too often." |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71335
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from kelvintan
May.26.2007
12:31AM EDT
→Email kelvintan
|
 |
LadyYour Number Nine Observed Humbleness
With Metta |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71336
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from ______
May.26.2007
06:57AM EDT
|
 |
sees no tricksters.
sees fragmented selves basking in bounty.
sees displays.
sees discontents.
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71337
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from -----0
May.26.2007
11:27AM EDT
|
 |
En Shin, the discussions here are neither interviews nor Dharma talks. This forum is simply just what it happens to be. People are not here as teachers and students, they are just posting. This is not know in traditional Zen, this is new.
You are imagining something and are troubled by the fact that reality does not fit your expectations. What you can do about it is go on posting in your own way. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71339
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Lynnoh
May.26.2007
12:53PM EDT
→Email Lynnoh
|
 |
En Shin,
thank you |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71343
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Lynnoh
May.26.2007
12:54PM EDT
→Email Lynnoh
|
 |
"austere" ? |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71344
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Woodsman
May.26.2007
01:51PM EDT
|
 |
"posture" |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71355
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Davidseon
May.27.2007
05:02AM EDT
→Email Davidseon
|
 |
Enshin, I agree with you about the one liners, I think they are are just from people who are playing at Zen and trying to come across as Knowing. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71375
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from kelvintan
May.27.2007
08:05AM EDT
→Email kelvintan
|
 |
Quote: "
En Shin, the discussions here are neither interviews nor Dharma talks. This forum is simply just what it happens to be. People are not here as teachers and students, they are just posting. This is not know in traditional Zen, this is new.
You are imagining something and are troubled by the fact that reality does not fit your expectations. What you can do about it is go on posting in your own way.
" ......... " .........
O Just as one lamp can disperse the darkness of a thousand years, one thought of wisdom can destroy then thousand years of delusion.
O if you meet a Good Knowing Advisor, if you listen to the true and right Dharma and cast out your own confusion and falseness, you can see your own true nature.
With Metta to All |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71376
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from zbishak
May.27.2007
08:54AM EDT
→Email zbishak
|
 |
''One is a direct communication between teacher and student, and much of that communication is beyond words, and does not appeal to the intellect, but to a deeper wisdom.'''
Hello En Shin,
contrary to how it may be for you, it was just that which appealed to the intellect so intensely that it could not be let go, and was the single motivation for the journey into zen.
The necessity of seeing for oneself did suggest a nuance of some unconditional credibility, equally appealing to the intellect and see it in the heart of the journey itself.
i am both a father and a son,
my father and son each hold my heart in their hands
it remains undivided
...............................................................................
can one be both a Christian and a Buddhist?
enlightenment has no deadline.
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71377
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from ______
May.27.2007
09:50AM EDT
|
 |
Quote: " Enshin, I agree with you about the one liners, I think they are are just from people who are playing at Zen and trying to come across as Knowing. " .........
On-liner. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71379
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from -----0
May.27.2007
10:45AM EDT
|
 |
no-liners come the closest all the rest is just a theory of complex concepts
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71381
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Woodsman
May.27.2007
02:38PM EDT
|
 |
Coca-Cola |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71384
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Pendragon
May.27.2007
10:45PM EDT
→Email Pendragon
|
 |
"the discussions here are neither interviews nor Dharma talks. This forum is simply just what it happens to be. People are not here as teachers and students, they are just posting. This is not known in traditional Zen, this is new."
Actually, similar conversations occurred among lazy and ignorant monks in decadent and intellectually sterile Buddhist monasteries, as Dogen noted. So there is nothing at all new about them.
One is always free to choose one's own actions and words. We can always make a continual effort to do better. Things do not have to "just happen".
En Shin speaks from his heart and shares wisdom based his experience. It is very fortunate for those who can see this. It is very unfortunate for those who cannot see this. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71387
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Woodsman
May.27.2007
11:00PM EDT
|
 |
Thank God, I'm no monk. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71388
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from -----0
May.28.2007
12:29PM EDT
|
 |
Quote: ". . . one thought of wisdom can destroy then thousand years of delusion . . ." .........
True! But still, in most of those Aha! -situations one delusion is replaced with another. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71394
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from kelvintan
May.28.2007
12:54PM EDT
→Email kelvintan
|
 |
Quote: "
Quote: ". . . one thought of wisdom can destroy then thousand years of delusion . . ." .........
True! But still, in most of those Aha! -situations one delusion is replaced with another.
" ......... " .........
O Delusion mislead us
"No other single thing exists
Like the hindrance of delusion,
Which so obstructs humankind
And makes it wander on forever."
Respect is an important ingredient in life.
If we do not respect others
we may not treat them well.
Everyone deserve respect
and to be treated well.
I thank you for your reply
May All Be Well And Happy
With Metta |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71396
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from El_Cid
May.28.2007
04:37PM EDT
|
 |
En Shin, you funny fellow ;-)
'I'm looking for the moon! Everyone except Bodhidharma chop off your fingers!' ...LOL!...
If you're looking for the 28th patriarch, You'll find him pointing at the moon. If, after that, you still seek the moon, You won't find it in any of our worthless fingers.
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71399
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Lynnoh
May.28.2007
04:40PM EDT
→Email Lynnoh
|
 |
in that pointing thing |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71400
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from boymonk
Jun.02.2007
07:35PM EDT
|
 |
Ok-now! If all the whining is f i n a l l y over with can we get back to rude one liners PLEASE!! hehe :) |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71570
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from HarryB
Jun.02.2007
08:31PM EDT
|
 |
Hi,
The gibberish of madmen speaks its own sort of sense in volumes, and 'The Good Fight' is just another fight.
Have a little rest, be compassionate to all our neurosisesesesesesessssss..... there's plenty of room for all.
Remember when all the monks came running out of the haunted woods terrified by the ghosts and ghouls? The Duddeah sent them back in instructing them to say to everything that they met "may you be happy, may you be well..."... and all was well-er or so they say. People are a pain in the ass though, there's no denying it, or rather there is denial, which isn't healthy either.
Regards,
Harry. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71573
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from oliveplume
Jun.03.2007
01:14AM EDT
→Email oliveplume
|
 |
En Shin,
I appreciate this post; I could be placed under the umbrella of newcomers. I can barely understand any of the answers given and my previous post was never actually answered.
If it wasn't for my confidence (faith?) in the philosophy, I just would have considered all these guys foolish and left a long time ago.
I'm hoping that maybe here and there, I will get a good response amongst the jibberish.
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71574
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Davidseon
Jun.03.2007
04:47AM EDT
→Email Davidseon
|
 |
Unfortunately, there are a number here, who consider their idioms as koans. They think they know what ther'e on about, however, it's obviously just their delusional thinking. To which, they will probably come back again with some crappy one liner and consider it intelligent.
Let us for the sake of compassion, just ignore them and pray they realise their true Buddha nature. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71575
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from HarryB
Jun.03.2007
06:22AM EDT
|
 |
When we realise our Buddha nature (we, all of us, that is), when our boat comes in, when the fat lady sings, when the angel blows his trumpet, when the waters part, when the horse runs well, when the mystery has finally come (good man, Leonard)... then, what will we think of such things as spurious comments on an internet site...?
Buddha has been typing all this time... tell him/her off!
Regards,
Harry. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71576
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from ______
Jun.03.2007
07:41AM EDT
|
 |
The world, including internet forum fora flora and fauna, will never conform to your structures, to your your ideas, of how you perceive things and people should or shouldn't be - your demands on your perceived other - your little disapproving, tetchy, sniffy, parrotboxes of disdain. Oh, and invoking 'compassion' won't work in that manner either, so sorry. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71577
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from ______
Jun.03.2007
07:48AM EDT
|
 |
As for the sake of compassion - you are only just ignoring yourself and your own jibberish - who exactly are they that you feel so compassionate for that you solicit others to pray with you for them? |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71578
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Woodsman
Jun.03.2007
10:12AM EDT
|
 |
I love the different sounds of birds singing each sunny morning. Each one of them has something special to sing about, but I can't understand. So, I just listen.. |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71584
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from Woodsman
Jun.03.2007
10:37AM EDT
|
 |
I love listening to silence when people tend to want to cut another down, it's like I am completely alone... it's great! |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71586
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from ______
Jun.03.2007
10:59AM EDT
|
 |
One bird said: Believe in love and I'll believe in you Believe in love and I'll believe if you
Believe in me
Manifest alive in the palm of a hand Aching Dreaming Breaking Crying Flying Crawling Falling Fading Wading Vital
|
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71587
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Reply from boymonk
Jun.03.2007
01:55PM EDT
|
 |
Quote: " En Shin,
I appreciate this post; I could be placed under the umbrella of newcomers. I can barely understand any of the answers given and my previous post was never actually answered.
If it wasn't for my confidence (faith?) in the philosophy, I just would have considered all these guys foolish and left a long time ago.
I'm hoping that maybe here and there, I will get a good response amongst the jibberish. " .........
D e a r Oliveplume!
Consider that (faith?) in philolo may be in actuality beliefeo, comprendo? And it's not like beliefeo is badeo, just don't clingeo. You dig, dadeo?!
Faith is an open heart nailed to a cross. <-- that's a pretty good one liner, huh!? |
|
|
 |
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
71588
|
 |
| |
| ←Back To Topic List |
|
↑Go to Top of Page |