 |
| →→→→ |
 |
TOPIC: ARISING |
|
|
|
Posted on Dec.18.2007 @ 11:32AM EDT by stephen
Distinctions and discriminations are but lines in the sand. One wave from the sea of emptiness clears all marks. This is because there is no independent arising. MU
|
|
↓Go to Latest Reply
|
→Reply to this Topic
→Email stephen
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from Lynnoh
Dec.18.2007
04:13PM EDT
→Email Lynnoh
|
|
coming and going..no... a thing or two |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
76962
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from Lionel
Dec.18.2007
06:42PM EDT
→Email Lionel
|
|
oh yah...we only know it is only moment of ceasing upon only moment of arising, ...it is a pair partnership & we have no right to analyse it... once it is known it is not anymore... till we break the chains of cause & effect, we keep on rolling or flowing... |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
76963
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from chontri
Dec.18.2007
07:14PM EDT
→Email chontri
|
|
stephen
Distinctions and discriminations are but lines in the sand. One wave from the sea of emptiness clears all marks. This is because there is no independent arising. MU
When something arises, it arises. When it subsides, it subsides. If you try doing something to it, another thing will arise.
|
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
76966
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from Woodsman
Dec.19.2007
09:53AM EDT
|
|
Be more specific.
Be more specific.
Be more specific.
Be more specific.
Be more specific.
Be more spcecific.
Be more specifice
Be more homely
Be more gommie
Be more allomie
Oh crap, he's gotta take it.
|
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
76978
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from -----0
Dec.19.2007
10:36AM EDT
|
|
Quote: "stephen
Distinctions and discriminations are but lines in the sand. One wave from the sea of emptiness clears all marks. This is because there is no independent arising. MU
When something arises, it arises. When it subsides, it subsides. If you try doing something to it, another thing will arise.
"
......... "
.........
when trying arises, it causes another thing to arise - how wonderful!
|
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
76979
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from ______
Dec.19.2007
01:50PM EDT
|
|
Theories from someone who understands diddly squat. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
76984
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from ______
Dec.19.2007
01:52PM EDT
|
|
Anyway, some lines in sand get fossilised - become beget fossils. So I prefer to do my writing in water, hey hoh. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
76985
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from lehish
Dec.19.2007
03:12PM EDT
→Email lehish
|
|
Quote: "Anyway, some lines in sand get fossilised - become beget fossils. So I prefer to do my writing in water, hey hoh."
.........
"do my writing" ? |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
76993
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from Woodsman
Dec.19.2007
03:41PM EDT
|
|
Spell cat. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
76998
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from Woodsman
Dec.19.2007
03:52PM EDT
|
|
I won't mind dat. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
77006
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from ______
Dec.19.2007
04:11PM EDT
|
|
Do yours do mine do do do do de dah de dah dah dah. Wotcha gonna show us next? Arseing? |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
77012
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from Woodsman
Dec.19.2007
04:17PM EDT
|
|
Please the indoors, by pleasing the outlaws. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
77019
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from Woodsman
Dec.19.2007
04:19PM EDT
|
|
Or the in-laws, outdoors., please. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
77020
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from ______
Dec.19.2007
04:24PM EDT
|
|
Send me an example of your wiring - I've seen your writing. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
77023
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from Woodsman
Dec.19.2007
04:27PM EDT
|
|
Yes, but the light is no question seen. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
77026
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from chontri
Dec.19.2007
09:31PM EDT
→Email chontri
|
|
Quote: "Be more specific.
Be more specific.
Be more specific.
Be more specific.
Be more specific.
Be more spcecific.
Be more specifice
Be more homely
Be more gommie
Be more allomie
"
.........
Mr Woodsman,
The more specific, the less general. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
77060
|
|
| |
|
|
Reply from Woodsman
Dec.19.2007
10:28PM EDT
|
|
I guessed not. I must be psychic, generally speaking. |
|
|
|
→Quote & Reply
→Post Reply
77063
|
|
| |
| ←Back To Topic List |
|
↑Go to Top of Page |
TIBETAN BUDDHA